<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Systems &amp; Ecosystems: Object Oriented Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inkblurt.com/2007/02/23/systems-ecosystems-object-oriented-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inkblurt.com/2007/02/23/systems-ecosystems-object-oriented-design/</link>
	<description>User Experience, Information Architecture &#38; Other Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:30:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.inkblurt.com/2007/02/23/systems-ecosystems-object-oriented-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8580</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkblurt.com/archives/452#comment-8580</guid>
		<description>Great post!

I&#039;ve been thinking a lot about the design of systems recently, and have been digging a into the soft systems thinking work done by people like Checkland and Wilson.

One of my takeaways from their work is that you can engage in the design of a system (it may appear to be the whole system from your position in the ecosystem), but you rarely design a system from scratch - they almost always pre-exist, and their structures are initially defined through emergence rather then design.  

What I find interesting from their (C &amp; W&#039;s) perspective is that when you engage in system design (action learning in their vocabulary), you actually become part of the system yourself, and your involvement changes the system whether it&#039;s through action or inaction.

Maybe we design our actions in systems instead of designing objects?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about the design of systems recently, and have been digging a into the soft systems thinking work done by people like Checkland and Wilson.</p>
<p>One of my takeaways from their work is that you can engage in the design of a system (it may appear to be the whole system from your position in the ecosystem), but you rarely design a system from scratch &#8211; they almost always pre-exist, and their structures are initially defined through emergence rather then design.  </p>
<p>What I find interesting from their (C &amp; W&#8217;s) perspective is that when you engage in system design (action learning in their vocabulary), you actually become part of the system yourself, and your involvement changes the system whether it&#8217;s through action or inaction.</p>
<p>Maybe we design our actions in systems instead of designing objects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
